The AI wrote it. Someone has to stand behind it.
LawyerSwipe puts the exact words that decide the matter in red, checks the AI's numbers and dates against them, and hands a lawyer licensed in your state one job: sign it, decline it, or send it back.
A demo with invented documents. Nothing is stored or sent, no account is open, and nothing here is legal advice.
Lease, section 3
The people who most need a lawyer are the ones the AI is failing.
Courts now keep a count of filings with AI-invented content. Every figure below links to its source.
court decisions found with hallucinated content from generative AI, updated Sept 28, 2026.
Charlotin databaseof those were filed by people without a lawyer. 829 were filed by lawyers. 137 were family law.
Same database, by party and fieldof answers from leading legal-research AI tools were wrong or misleading in a Stanford test.
Stanford RegLabof the serious civil legal problems of low-income Americans got no or too little legal help.
Legal Services Corporation, 2022“When people are in court without a lawyer, bad things happen.”Indiana Chief Justice Brent Dickson, on family and civil courts where 60 percent of family law litigants had no lawyer in 2013 (IAALS)
The public is asking AI legal questions because a lawyer is out of reach. The fix is not to stop them. It is to put a licensed lawyer's real review between the answer and the person.
Five documents. One job each.
Red is the exact text of the document that decides the matter. The right column is the AI's narrative, not the document.
The AI reads nationally. The law is local, so the signer is too.
A question from a state with no signing lawyer is held, not answered by AI alone. Press a state to see what would happen to your question today.
Ask a plain question. A lawyer signs the answer or says no.
A draft comes back. A lawyer reads it, checks it against current law in your state, and signs it as general information, declines it, or sends it back for facts. If you want an opinion on your own situation, the lawyer can take you on directly as a client. That is between you and the lawyer.
1. Ask
Answered by a signing lawyer
2. Review (the lawyer's side)
The same structure for a company's legal department.
An AI reads the contract. The right lawyer decides, by rules the company sets.
Who signs what
Example rules. A company writes its own thresholds.
What the signing lawyer gets
Your license. Your client. Your fee.
We are building a network of family lawyers first, one state at a time, who sign or decline AI-drafted answers for people in their own state.
Three commitments
- You never see a price on the card. A fee that fires on signing turns your license into a payment gate. Declining costs you nothing.
- No cut of your fee, no pay per lead. Avvo shut down its flat-fee legal marketplace in 2018 after state bars objected on fee-sharing and referral grounds (Hinshaw). Colorado's opinion 122 treats pay-per-lead services as impermissible (CBA). We will ask your bar before any fee exists.
- Clients who want an opinion engage you directly. The relationship, the engagement letter and the fee are yours.
Tell us where you practice
No model in the checks. No made-up percentages.
A claim passes only if its quoted words appear verbatim in the document and its numbers, dates and weekdays agree with the quote. A clause the document contains that the summary never carries is flagged as missing. A statement that goes beyond the document's words is marked as the AI's reading and gets no score, because that one is yours to judge. No confidence percentage is shown: none has been measured on legal drafts, and inventing one would be the failure this is built to catch.